When it comes to proving that a duty of care existed, however, the claimant must show that the defendant owed him/her a duty of care is respect of the type of damage which he has suffered. This is because the law is more reluctant to offer its protection to the claimant in respect of certain types of losses than for others. In the present situation, for example, both Bertram and Ruth have suffered rigorously economic loss.
To properly answer this question, then, it is first necessary to look what is meant when one refers to economic loss. Many losses resulting from negligence could be regarded as economic.
A case which usefully illustrates the difference between damage, economic loss arising from personal injury and/or damage to property and pure economic loss is Spartan Steele v Martin . Here, the defendants negligently cut an electric cable, causing a position cut that lasted for 14 hours. Without electricity to heat the claimants furnace, the surface in the furnace solidified and the claimants had to shut down their factory. They claimed for damage to the metal that was in the furnace at the time of the power cut (physical damage to property), loss of the profit that they would have made on selling that metal (economic loss arising from damage to property), and loss of profit on the metal that would have been processed during the time that the factory was...If you want to tie a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.